The Majority in Parliament has mentioned that the 2024 budget assertion stands accepted by the voice vote that passed off in Parliament on Wednesday, November 29 till the headcount that the speaker Alban Bagbin has requested the Business Committee to reschedule for subsequent week, says in any other case.
In Parliament on Thursday, November 30, the speaker, in asking the Business Committee to reschedule the headcount, indicated that the matter shouldn’t be up for debate.
“We do not should debate this matter. It is a matter of report and I direct that the enterprise committee ought to reschedule the problem for subsequent week for us to lastly take a choice on the price range.
“The budget statement and economic policy of the government for the year 2024 is still before the house and so the business committee will reschedule it for next week,” he mentioned.
Parliament couldn’t approve the price range on Wednesday, November 29 after the Majority facet of the home boycotted proceedings, making it the second time they’re strolling out on their very own price range after they first did so on the 2022 budget statement which launched the e-levy.
An announcement issued by Deputy Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin on Thursday, November 30 mentioned “Following the conclusion of the debate on the budget yesterday, the Speaker, as per the established protocol of the House, was to put the question regarding the approval of the policy and principles underpinning the budget. After a period of deliberation, the Speaker posed the question and announced that the “ayes” had it. Subsequently, the Deputy Minority Leader, Armah Kofi-Buah, rose on account of Order 113(2) to contest what he (Mr. Armah Kofi-Buah) deemed as a ruling by the Rt. Hon. Speaker. As a results of the problem, he known as for a headcount. This prompted an intervention from the Majority Leader and Deputy Majority Leader.
“They raised procedural points in respect of the appliance introduced earlier than the Speaker. Despite the procedural objections raised, the Speaker declined to acknowledge these issues and expressed his intention to proceed with a headcount as demanded. At this juncture, the management of the bulk caucus insisted on their readiness to undergo the headcount that was being sought.
“The headcount, a process where members indicating “aye” or “no” rise to be counted, usually takes roughly 10 minutes. The outcomes are then tallied by desk officers and offered to the Speaker, who broadcasts the result. Instead of sticking to the request of the headcount, the Speaker then mentioned that he was drawing the eye of the House to the potential for resorting to a division, and certainly the Speaker then known as for a division. This got here as a shock to Members of the Majority Caucus, since no such software for a division had been offered to the Speaker.
“The choice to name for a division was actually not the preliminary software. Leadership of the Majority,-well conscious that underneath our guidelines, being absent throughout a headcount disqualifies a member from being recorded current, whereas in a division, absent members who rush in will be counted as members, even when they weren’t current when the query was initially put- ; moved to halt this course of that will have allowed among the minority MPs who have been outdoors Accra on the time to have the ability to proceed to Parliament to be counted, although the Majority was absolutely conscious that it was not going to present the minority any benefit.
“This departure from the decision for a headcount generated warmth and was set to frustrate authorities business; on the similar time undermining the sanctity of the parliamentary processes. Since 1993, Parliament has by no means resorted to a division in making choices. The Majority concluded the selection for a division was unfair underneath the circumstance, resulting in their choice to stage a walkout.
“It is essential to note that despite the Speaker’s indication that the ‘ayes’ had prevailed, and despite a petition presented to him, a petition that hadn’t followed due process, the Speaker’s initial ruling on the ‘ayes’ retaining their advantage stands. Consequently, the budget has been duly passed until the appeal for a headcount is dealt with, not the division that the Speaker had called.”
Parliament couldn’t approve the price range on Wednesday, November 29 after the Majority facet of the home boycotted proceedings, making it the second time they’re strolling out on their very own price range after they first did so on the 2022 budget statement which launched the e-levy.
They disagreed with the way in which the Mr Bagbin was conducting the enterprise. They accused the Speaker of delaying proceedings to ensure that the Minority to have their full numbers within the House.
“Sam George is not here, Zanetor is not here, Mahama Ayariga, is not here so five of their members are not here. All the speaker is doing is to delay time for their members to come,” Majority Leader Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu instructed journalists after they walked out.
The Speaker needed to droop sitting.
Ningo Prampram Lawmaker Samuel Nartey George nevertheless rubbished the declare that he was not in Parliament.
The Minority Leader Dr Cassiel Ato Forson accused the New Patriotic Party (NPP) of missing the numbers to approve the 2024 budget assertion.
Addressing the press, Dr Ato Forson mentioned “The NPP doesn’t have the numbers to approve their very own price range, sensing defeat they determined to stroll out. The NDC MPs have been able to vote in opposition to the price range.
“Our position is that we can allow the budget to go through in its current form because the ordinary Ghanaian will suffer. John Kumah is not here, Kennedy Agyapong is not here and sensing defeat they walked out, we will not stop, we will do what we have to do. The Budget has not been approved.”