The Minority in Parliament has noted with disappointment, an online news publication attributed to Hon. Samuel Atta-Akyea, in which he was reported to have made some very wild and baseless assertions to the effect that the previous John Mahama-led government energy agreements cost the nation over $320 million for unused power in 2018.
The surprising thing is that Mr. Atta-Akyea was reported to have been speaking on behalf of the Mines and Energy Committee. For the avoidance of doubt, the Mines and Energy Committee has never taken such a position.
Neither has the Committee mandated Mr. Attta-Kyea to speak on its behalf in respect of the Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed under President Mahama which, with all intents and purposes, have proven to be the
reason for Ghana’s current stable electricity supply.
The reported claim that the former administration entered into 43 take-or-pay Power Purchase Agreements resulting in the current government being obligated to pay over 320 million dollars in 2018 for unused power charges is not only false but a clear lack of appreciation of Ghana’s power sector.
The records from the Energy Commission’s 2018 Energy Statistics are available for verification. From these records, a total of 13 thermal plants operated in 2018, with only three (3) signed under President Mahama.
How the New Patriotic Party and its communicators are able to concoct and embellish such unfounded payments for 43 take- or-pay power agreements in 2018 alone is shocking and mind-boggling.
The Minority wishes to caution in the strongest terms that it will not allow the name of the Mines and Energy Committee to be used for self-seeking and propaganda-laden political communication.
Source: HON. JOHN ABDULAI JINAPOR, MP RANKING MEMBER, MINES AND ENERGY COMMITTEE
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
Featured Video