A cautionary tale from South Africa’s ‘just energy transition’

Hello and welcome again to Energy Source, coming to you at this time from London and Johannesburg.

Brett Christophers, the creator of The Price is Wrong: Why Capitalism Won’t Save the Planet, had a hot take in last weekend’s FT: we should not be fooled into considering that China’s speedy rollout of renewables means the vitality transition is on monitor.

The change to inexperienced electrical energy may be very erratically distributed, as at this time’s dispatch from the FT’s Rob Rose in South Africa makes clear. The nation, which relies on coal for greater than 70 per cent of its vitality and is the world’s 11th-biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, dangers dropping momentum in its shift to renewables.

A brand new coalition authorities is grappling with how you can cut back the nation’s dependence on coal, however as Rob explains, there may be prone to be loads of financial and political turmoil forward. — Malcolm

An ‘atomic bomb scenario’ for jobs: a South African coal plant’s failed repurposing

South Africa’s Komati Power Station — a 63-year-old plant nestled away within the coronary heart of the Mpumalanga province within the nation’s coal belt — gives a cautionary story of how the “just energy transition” can go badly awry in growing international locations.

This is a lesson that Dan Marokane, the chief govt of South Africa’s energy utility Eskom, believes should be absorbed by different growing nations planning their very own transition in the direction of renewable energy.

In October 2022, South Africa’s authorities shut down Komati, which at its peak was twice the dimensions of some other within the nation, with a capability of 1,000 megawatts of electrical energy. The determination was in step with its Just Energy Transition Investment Plan.

Heralded as one of many largest world “repurposing” initiatives away from fossil fuels, the World Bank mobilised $497mn for the Komati challenge, which aimed to transform it right into a renewable vitality era web site powered by 150MW of photo voltaic, 70MW of wind and 150MW of battery storage.

It was an unmitigated catastrophe, Marokane advised a convention in Cape Town organised by the Africa’s largest financial institution, Standard Bank, this month.

“If you look at the concentration of that power station in one municipal district, you literally create an atomic bomb scenario in terms of social discord,” stated Marokane, who has been within the job since March.

The city had been solely constructed across the plant, which supplied jobs to an estimated two-thirds of the residents at one level. Yet when Komati was “repurposed”, many have been left with out work in a rustic the place unemployment is already 32.9 per cent.

It additionally created a lot resentment locally, with one chief saying final yr that he believed the repurposing challenge had been created to “plant poverty” within the space. Gwede Mantashe, the nation’s mining minister who has lengthy been an advocate of coal, had cited Komati for example of an “unjust energy transition”. 

To guarantee this lesson gained wider world traction, Marokane stated Eskom led a World Bank workforce to Komati earlier this month “because we wanted them to have first-hand experience of what can go wrong if you don’t do the planning adequately”.

The World Bank workforce spoke on to folks in these communities, Marokane stated, who may “translate their experiences on the ground, and their fears”.

It was, he stated, a sobering expertise for the Washington-based funding establishment. “There is now no confusion about this. All of us are now aligned that we should not repeat Komati,” Marokane stated.

In November, South Africa’s presidential local weather fee launched a report detailing the teachings from Komati, discovering that the method to repurpose the plant “fell short of inclusive and participatory engagements” whereas higher “economic diversification plans” have been wanted.

“Komati is a test case, both locally and globally,” Crispian Olver, head of the fee, advised Energy Source. “It’s shown us how important it is that Eskom diversifies the local economy, and supports workers in the transition.”

“The truth is, the market for coal is going to phase out, and those who try to block planning for the future are undermining the livelihood of those workers who could be assisted in the transition,” he stated. “If we continue with a coal-dominated economy, we’ll be shut out of markets in Europe, Australia and even the US. We’ll cease to be an export country and we’ll lose all those jobs.”

Peter Venn, the chief govt of Seriti Green, a renewables firm, stated South Africa wanted to make sure that the vitality transition was actually “just”.

“There are hundreds of thousands of jobs in Mpumalanga, the energy heartland of South Africa, where if you shut down those coal stations magically tomorrow, those people wouldn’t have work,” he stated.

There was no method {that a} renewables plant would have the ability to take in a coal plant shutting down, Venn stated. The comparability, he stated, was {that a} coal mine using 1,000 folks might be changed by a wind farm using 50 folks. “We have a short window to fix this,” he stated, and should guarantee the proper insurance policies have been in place, with correct planning for the transition.

Foreign funding ‘at risk’

There is extra at stake for South Africa. The most industrialised nation in Africa is a check case for a way the vitality transition will play out on the continent, as the federal government has been given funding of billions of {dollars} primarily based on its simply transition plan.

At COP26 in 2021, the International Partners Group made up of France, Germany, the UK, US and EU agreed to offer the nation with financing of $8.5bn to “accelerate the decarbonisation of South Africa’s economy and move towards clean energy sources”. This has since been raised to $9.3bn.

But the Komati debacle, and a crippling collection of blackouts which wiped billions of {dollars} from the nation’s GDP and condemned progress to lower than 1 per cent yearly, led South Africa’s authorities to choose to increase the lifetime of its coal energy stations. Three vegetation — Grootvlei, Camden and Hendrina — have been initially because of be mothballed within the subsequent few years, however have had their retirement dates prolonged to 2030.

Marokane stated suspending the closure of those energy stations would give the nation sufficient time to place in place mitigation measures to take care of the social fallout of the transition, whereas making certain vitality safety.

Concerns have arisen, nonetheless, that South Africa now dangers dropping the funding from the IPG. 

But Marokane stated the Komati catastrophe had been defined to the group of funders, and “we’ve had no resistance” from them to the change of plan.

“We explained the rationale of going this way,” he stated. “Everyone recognises that on the one hand, you have to solve the issues of the transition, on the other, you have to have a very calculated and responsible way of bringing society along,” Marokane added.

President Cyril Ramaphosa reiterated this sentiment on July 15, talking to a local weather summit within the nation’s capital.

“South Africa will decarbonise at a pace and scale that is affordable to our economy and society. If we act too fast, we risk damaging huge sections of our economy before we have built alternative energy and industrial capabilities. At the same time, not acting now risks our economic stability,” he stated. 

Ramaphosa stated the nation was nonetheless dedicated to the transition plan, which goals to leverage the $9.3bn from the IPG to boost $98bn. “This will drive huge investments in the electricity grid, green hydrogen, electric vehicles, economic diversification and skills development,” he stated.

Olver stated that “some of the financing might be at risk” from the delay in decommissioning energy stations to 2030. But, he stated, there was little choice in the midst of an vitality disaster.

“I think the funders broadly understand that getting energy security by bringing new energy on to the grid is a process, rather than an instant event,” Olver stated. (Rob Rose)

Power Points

Energy Source is written and edited by Jamie Smyth, Myles McCormick, Amanda Chu, Tom Wilson and Malcolm Moore, with help from the FT’s world workforce of reporters. Reach us at [email protected] and observe us on X at @FTEnergy. Catch up on previous editions of the publication here.