By Kwame Asamoah
In all my years within the cocoa-chocolate sector, one of the crucial irritating observations I’ve made is how reverse psychology is usually employed in dangerous religion. It’s used to justify reactionary strikes and political rhetoric, all whereas exploiting the general public’s lack of knowledge about our underlying errors and ineptitude.
This is what impressed me to begin writing. Recently, information broke that Ghana has ended a 32-year custom of looking for worldwide loans to finance its cocoa purchases. However, the story is extra advanced than it seems. While some experiences recommend that COCOBOD, the entity liable for cocoa in Ghana, has boldly determined to ditch international loans in finance the 2024/2025 cocoa season, others asserted that COCOBOD’s $1.5 billion mortgage request was rejected by international banks, forcing them to hunt various funding.
So on this article I’ll clarify to you what the Syndicated mortgage and the historical past of looking for worldwide loans to finance our cocoa beans
The genesis of the syndicated mortgage
To perceive COCOBOD’s monetary choices, it’s important to first perceive the position of syndicated loans. A syndicated mortgage is a sort of financing the place a number of lenders come collectively to offer funds to a single borrower, sometimes used for large-scale initiatives the place the required quantity exceeds the capability of a single lender. While such loans may be sourced domestically or internationally, Ghana has traditionally targeted on elevating syndicated loans from worldwide sources, notably within the cocoa sector, because of the vital capital required and the worldwide nature of the commerce.
In the context of Ghana’s cocoa business, COCOBOD yearly raises syndicated loans to finance the acquisition of cocoa beans. The course of entails negotiating with a consortium of worldwide banks to safe the required funds. Once an settlement is reached, the mortgage is syndicated, which means {that a} group of banks commits to offering parts of the full mortgage quantity, thereby sharing the danger and reward.
Local banks in Ghana additionally play an important position, generally contributing to the mortgage and most instances managing transactions, guaranteeing the funds can be found when wanted, and supporting the acquisition of cocoa beans through the harvest season. This course of has been very important for sustaining liquidity within the sector, permitting COCOBOD to purchase cocoa beans from farmers at steady costs, which in flip helps the livelihoods of those farmers and sustains the business’s development.
Why have been they taking loans within the first place?
Ghana’s reliance on syndicated loans, notably within the cocoa sector, is primarily pushed by the necessity to safe massive quantities of capital shortly and effectively to finance the acquisition of cocoa beans through the harvest season.
The seasonal nature of cocoa manufacturing requires vital upfront funding to make sure that COCOBOD can buy beans from farmers at costs decided by Ghana Cocoa Board (not the farmer ie. Being the regulator, purchaser and value determiner. Doing the precise colonial commodity market practices we search to cease). The massive scale of those monetary necessities usually exceeds the capability of home banks alone, making worldwide syndicated loans a sensible answer.
Moreover, by choosing syndicated loans, Ghana can entry a wider pool of economic sources, faucet into beneficial rates of interest, and share the danger amongst a number of worldwide and native monetary establishments.
This diversified danger is especially necessary in a sector as risky as agriculture, the place market costs can fluctuate broadly. The worldwide nature of those loans aligns with the worldwide commerce of cocoa, enabling COCOBOD to keep up a gentle move of capital to help the complete Ghanaian worth chain from manufacturing to export.
Another key benefit for COCOBOD in looking for syndicated loans from worldwide sources is the profit they achieve from the depreciation of the Ghanaian cedi towards the U.S. greenback. When COCOBOD secures a mortgage in {dollars}, they buy cocoa beans from farmers in Ghana cedis.
Given the historic common depreciate charge of the Ghana Cedi by about 20% 12 months on 12 months since 1992, the worth of the Ghanaian cedi tends to depreciate towards the greenback. This depreciation implies that, over time, COCOBOD wants fewer {dollars} to purchase the identical quantity of cocoa beans in cedis, because the native foreign money loses worth. It’s form of robbing Peter to pay Paul. In this case peter is the farmer. So cocoa beans are purchased from farmers a decreasing when foreign money depreciation and inflation are factored into it producer value.
Since COCOBOD repays the mortgage in {dollars} and sells the cocoa beans internationally (usually receiving cost in {dollars} or the Ghana Cedi equal), they successfully defend themselves from alternate charge or forex-related losses.
In reality, the depreciation of the cedi works of their favour, permitting them to generate extra cedi income from their greenback gross sales whereas having to pay much less in greenback phrases for his or her native purchases. This alternate charge benefit permits COCOBOD to build up extra money, which can be utilized to cowl curiosity funds on the mortgage or to reinvest (in the event that they need to, what I’m speaking about) within the cocoa sector.
If COCOBOD have been to supply these funds regionally in Ghanaian cedis, they might keep away from foreign exchange points, however the high-interest charges in Ghana would make this strategy unsustainable. I might need to even consider that they could have a hedging insurance coverage in place to make sure they don’t fall prey to the results of the Ghana Cedi depreciation. The massive scale of financing required by COCOBOD, usually within the billions of {dollars}, would drive up native rates of interest as a result of elevated demand for loans.
This would considerably improve the price of borrowing, making it costlier than the advantages they might achieve from the depreciation of the cedi. Thus, by borrowing internationally, COCOBOD not solely secures decrease rates of interest but in addition capitalizes on foreign money depreciation to boost their monetary place, making it a extra strategic and sustainable selection for the group.
Source: Authour’s Calculation (Raw information from Ghana Cocoa Board)
Lastly, our pursuit of worldwide loans is extra of a political manoeuvre than an effort to prioritise farmers’ pursuits. The cocoa syndicated mortgage represents one of many largest precise inflows of U.S. {dollars} into the Ghanaian economic system (Billions), which briefly boosts the availability of {dollars} and helps stabilise the cedi, even when solely barely and briefly. This political curiosity usually takes priority when looking for these loans.
For the Bank of Ghana, sustaining overseas alternate reserves is essential for supporting imports mandatory for financial development, such because the equipment wanted to begin factories which might be anticipated to drive financial advantages for the nation or the oil we want for our power wants. But that’s a dialogue for an additional day.
A more in-depth take a look at the purported shift
Ghana Cocoa Board remains to be looking for worldwide Loans: Despite claims that COCOBOD is now not looking for worldwide loans, it’s necessary to make clear that the loans they’re now looking for from merchants are nonetheless worldwide in nature. These merchants are world corporations, and any financing they supply would probably be sourced from worldwide monetary markets.
These corporations (Olam, and many others) are overseas entities. Therefore, the assertion that COCOBOD has made a daring shift away from worldwide financing is deceptive. The reality is, the funds nonetheless originate from worldwide sources, albeit by means of a special channel.
Prefinancing vs. Loans from Traders: What’s Really Happening?
There appears to be confusion between prefinancing and loans from merchants. Prefinancing refers to receiving cost for future cocoa deliveries upfront, much like the ahead sale agreements COCOBOD already engages in.
This strategy is extra advantageous as a result of it doesn’t contain curiosity funds, or the ability dynamics related to conventional loans. Offcourse it has its setbacks which incorporates agreeing to costs which can probably change (not in your favour) therefore stopping cocoa board from benefiting from elevated present costs.
If COCOBOD is certainly shifting in direction of prefinancing, it won’t be as revolutionary because it sounds however relatively a reshuffling of present practices. However, if COCOBOD is treating these as loans, it dangers rising the affect of those merchants over Ghana’s cocoa market.
A reactionary choice, not a strategic shift
The narrative of COCOBOD breaking free from worldwide loans may appear to be a strategic transfer, however proof suggests it’s extra reactionary. Reports that COCOBOD’s mortgage request was rejected point out that this choice could have been compelled upon them relatively than being a deliberate shift.
Furthermore, statements from the Daily Graphic describing this as a “temporary measure” additional undermine the concept of a long-term strategic change. It’s probably that this example arose as a result of worldwide lenders have gotten cautious of COCOBOD’s capacity to repay loans, particularly as cocoa manufacturing—and subsequently the collateral for these loans—declines. What’s being offered as a proactive technique may really be a mandatory response to a lack of monetary credibility.
The Conflict of Interest: Ghana Cocoa Board as Judge and Jury
One of the core points is COCOBOD’s twin position as each regulator and market participant. This battle of curiosity can result in conditions like the present one, the place COCOBOD’s monetary practices come below scrutiny.
If the non-public sector managed cocoa shopping for and promoting, whereas COCOBOD targeted solely on regulation, farmers may really feel extra protected and guaranteed that their pursuits are being safeguarded by Ghana Cocoa Board relatively than Ghana Cocoa Board being part of the issue. However, the federal government’s deep financial curiosity in cocoa, which is a major supply of overseas alternate, makes it unlikely that COCOBOD will relinquish its management and the continual sourcing of loans internationally.
This focus of energy has led to inefficiencies and vulnerabilities, comparable to the present mortgage rejection. Ghana Cocoa board ought to deal with rigorous meticulous rules not purchase/promoting.
The risks of COCOBOD’s semi-autonomous standing
COCOBOD’s semi-autonomous standing below the ministry of finance and financial planning (why not the ministry of agriculture) complicates its position additional. Unlike different authorities companies funded by taxpayers, COCOBOD generates its personal funds, primarily by means of deductions from cocoa farmers.
This construction incentivizes COCOBOD to focus extra on income era relatively than efficient regulation. As lengthy as COCOBOD continues to function this fashion, it should prioritise its position as a purchaser and vendor over that of a regulator, perpetuating conflicts of curiosity and monetary inefficiencies. The absence of an unbiased regulatory physique to supervise COCOBOD’s operations exacerbates these points, resulting in conditions the place mortgage rejections and monetary mismanagement come into play and it must be a authorities challenge to take care of.
Financial Inefficiency and the Need for Reform
The monetary information from Ghana Cocoa Board’s (COCOBOD) annual experiences from 2012/13 to 2018/19 paints a regarding image of the group’s monetary effectivity and operational effectiveness. As the only real authorized purchaser and vendor of cocoa beans in Ghana, COCOBOD performs an important position within the nation’s economic system. However, the constant sample of losses and fluctuating earnings throughout these years raises severe questions concerning the competence and administration of COCOBOD.
Source Authour’s Calculation (Raw Data from Ghana Cocoa Board’s accessible monetary experiences on its web site)
Between 2012/13 and 2018/19, COCOBOD recorded vital losses in a number of years regardless of receiving substantial syndicated loans from worldwide sources. For occasion, in 2012/13, COCOBOD recorded a lack of GH¢150 million regardless of having a gross sales turnover of GH¢7.88 billion.
This the mentioned of their monetary report as being attributed to a lower in manufacturing and decrease gross sales costs. However, the persistent losses in subsequent years, comparable to GH¢199.4 million in 2015/16 and GH¢394.8 million in each 2016/17 and 2018/19, recommend that the problems transcend exterior elements like manufacturing volumes and market costs.
In a typical aggressive market, corporations that have constant losses over a number of years are compelled to make vital modifications—whether or not in management, technique, or operations—to right course. Yet, COCOBOD’s recurring losses point out a scarcity of efficient response to those monetary challenges.
This raises issues concerning the monetary effectivity and accountability throughout the group. Unlike non-public corporations, which face the stress of competitors and regulation to stay worthwhile, COCOBOD operates as a monopoly within the cocoa sector. This monopoly standing could contribute to a scarcity of urgency in addressing inefficiencies, as COCOBOD doesn’t face the identical market pressures as non-public entities.
The position of COCOBOD as each the regulator and the first market participant creates a possible battle of curiosity. While COCOBOD is meant to behave in one of the best curiosity of the farmers and the broader economic system, its operational inefficiencies and monetary losses recommend that it is probably not fulfilling this mandate successfully.
The lack of a separate regulatory physique to supervise COCOBOD’s operations additional worsens this challenge. In most sectors, regulators exist to make sure that market gamers function effectively, pretty, and within the public curiosity. However, within the case of COCOBOD, there appears to be no such oversight, permitting the organisation to proceed its operations with out adequate checks and balances.
Moreover, the reliance on worldwide syndicated loans, whereas useful in some respects, doesn’t appear to deal with the underlying points of economic mismanagement. These loans present COCOBOD with the liquidity wanted to buy cocoa beans upfront, however the persistent monetary losses recommend that the issue lies not with the supply of the funds however with how these funds are managed and utilized. At worse, it results in moneys meant to be given to farmers, paid to worldwide lenders as interes.
To Conclude, The current developments surrounding COCOBOD’s financing technique present deeper points throughout the organisation. While the transfer away from worldwide syndicated loans may appear to be a daring, strategic choice, the fact seems to be extra reactionary, pushed by monetary constraints and a scarcity of quick viable options.
Seeking loans out of your purchaser places again energy into the fingers of the client, therefore weakening your negotiation energy within the course of. COCOBOD’s twin position as regulator and market participant, mixed with its semi-autonomous standing, has created a system the place monetary inefficiency and conflicts of curiosity are inevitable. Until these structural points are addressed, COCOBOD’s capacity to successfully handle Ghana’s cocoa sector will stay in query. The downside isn’t simply the place the cash comes from—it’s how COCOBOD operates throughout the system it controls.
Email: [email protected]