The Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame has expressed fear that the tendency for cops to impound automobiles which are used to cross purple gentle or are pushed with out legitimate insurance coverage certificates, is inflicting useless fits for presidency.
He has due to this fact written to the Inspector General of Police, Dr George Akuffo Dampare that such acts are minor offences, thus have to be handled as such.
“As Attorney-General and the principal legal adviser to the Government, I advise that police officers should desist from the impounding or prohibition of the use of a motor vehicle for minor offences such as an alleged violation of any of the rules of the road contained in Regulation 106, and other provisions pertaining to crossing the red light or driving a vehicle without a valid insurance certificate etc.” Mr Dame acknowledged within the letter addressed to the IGP dated ninth February, 2024.
![](https://uploads.files.3news.com/2024/03/Godfred-Dame-670x424-1-300x190.png)
According to the Attorney- General, it’s unreasonable to impound such automobiles.
“An unreasonable exercise of discretion or a failure to adhere to the advice herein has the tendency to result in unnecessary suits against the Government, occasioning needless expense and potentially avoidable judgment debts. The Office of the Attorney-General is already inundated with many suits arising from wrongful exercise of discretion and negligence by police officers. Further, it ought to be noted that responsibility for maintaining the condition of an impounded vehicle shifts from the owner of the vehicle to the State. Impounded vehicles are exposed to the risks of deterioration and theft of essential parts,” a portion of the letter learn.
![](https://3news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/IGP-Dampare-637x424-1-300x200.jpg)
Read full letter under:
RE: IMPOUNDING OF OR PROHIBITION OF THE USE OF MOTOR VEHICLES FOR MINOR VIOLATIONS OF ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
I want your good self and the Ghana Police Service a Happy New Year.
The Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice has acquired incessant complaints from members of the general public together with attorneys and senior public officers in regards to the tendency of officers of the Ghana Police Service to impound or prohibit using motor automobiles deemed to have violated provisions of the Road Traffic Regulations 2012 (L. I. 2180).
The provisions of L. I. 2180 beneath which cops repeatedly train the discretion to impound automobiles, relate to alleged violations of the “Rules of the road” contained in Regulation 106. and different provisions pertaining to crossing the purple gentle or driving a car with out a legitimate insurance coverage certificates. A cause typically superior by cops for impounding a car is the need to “use the vehicle as an exhibit” in court docket proceedings. Whilst noting the mandate of personnel of the Ghana Police Service, we observe that related provisions of Regulation 158 of L. I. 2180 which govern the facility to examine, impound and prohibit using motor automobiles stipulate as follows:
“158(1) An examiner, an authorised car inspector appointed by the Licensing Authority or a police officer might examine a motorcar or a trailer to establish whether or not the provisions of the Act or a regulation made or allow issued beneath the Act are being complied with.
(2) In the occasion of non-compliance, an examiner authorised by the Licensing Authority or a police officer not under the rank of inspector might by order in writing prohibit the additional use of the motorcar or the trailer till the availability has been complied with.
(5) Where a motorcar or trailer is discovered parked on a highway, a police officer might impound the motorcar or trailer or trigger it to be taken to a police station or place of security and be detained there till the proprietor of the motorcar or trailer and the individual driving the motorcar or accountable for the trailer may be recognized and handled as offered for beneath these Regulations.
(7) An individual who contravenes this regulation commits an offence and is liable on abstract conviction to a high-quality of not lower than twenty-five penalty models and no more than fifty penalty models or to a time period of imprisonment of no more than three months or to each.”
A cautious examination of L. I. 2180 will disclose that the violations, for which cops repeatedly impound automobiles, together with Regulation 106 (Rules of the highway) and different provisions regarding ignoring purple gentle and driving with out a legitimate insurance coverage, are misdemeanours. This is definitely discernible from the prescribed punishment of a most of fifty penalty models, or a time period of imprisonment of no more than three months or to each. By advantage of part 1 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29). a “misdemeanour” is construed in accordance with part 296 of the Criminal and different Offences (Procedure) Act, 1960 (Act 30). Section 296(4) of Act 30 stipulates as follows:
“Where a criminal offence which is not an offence mentioned in subsection (5), is declared by an enactment to be a misdemeanour and the punishment for that offence is not specified, a person convicted of that offence is liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding three years.” It is thus past doubt that the violations the subject material of this letter are misdemeanours.
An software of the highway site visitors laws, notably Regulation 158 requires equity, candour and reasonableness. The impounding of a car will not be needed for proof of a violation of any of the principles contained in Regulation 158 or certainly, a lot of the provisions in L. I. 2180. Thus, a place that the car is required to be “used as an exhibit” in court docket is untenable and unreasonable.
As Attorney-General and the principal authorized adviser to the Government, I counsel that cops ought to desist from the impounding or prohibition of using a motorcar for minor offences comparable to an alleged violation of any of the principles of the highway contained in Regulation 106, and different provisions pertaining to crossing the purple gentle or driving a car with out a legitimate insurance coverage certificates. and many others.
An unreasonable train of discretion or a failure to stick to the recommendation herein has the tendency to lead to pointless fits in opposition to the Government, occasioning useless expense and probably avoidable judgment money owed. The Office of the Attorney-General is already inundated with many fits arising from wrongful train of discretion and negligence by cops. Further, it must be famous that duty for sustaining the situation of an impounded car shifts from the proprietor of the car to the State. Impounded automobiles are uncovered to the dangers of degradation and theft of important components.
Accept the assurances of my highest esteem.
GODFRED YEBOAH DAME
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND MINISTER FOR JUSTICE