The minority in Parliament has maintained that the Attorney-General’s recommendation to the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has vindicated the speaker on the choice to halt the approval processes of President Akufo-Addo’s ministerial nominees.
The minority caucus, in a press release dated Monday, March 25, underscored that the Attorney-General, in a letter to the Speaker, searching for to fault the Speaker’s ruling as an alternative “vindicated the position taken by the Rt. Hon. Speaker, who merely took a cue from a precedent that was set by President Akufo-Addo based on an “advice” from this similar Attorney-General”.
Mr. Dame, in a March 18 letter to the President, suggested President Akufo-Addo to not take any motion in relation to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill 2024 pending a Supreme Court choice on two separate functions for interlocutory injunction in opposition to Parliament and the President.
The minority urged Mr. Dame to “prioritise the national interest over his party’s parochial and self-serving interests”.
Also, the minority emphasised that, based mostly on the recommendation of Mr. Dame on a “non-existing” swimsuit, President Akufo-Addo instructed the diplomatic group that there was a swimsuit earlier than the Supreme Court stopping him from assenting to the anti-gay invoice on March 4, 2024.
Read additionally:
The president due to this fact referred to as on Ghanaians to attend for the Supreme Court’s dedication of the matter. However, the swimsuit was filed on the Supreme Court on March 5, 2024.
“On the opposite, it will be recalled that President Akufo-Addo knowledgeable members of the Diplomatic Corps at a gathering on the Peduase Lodge on 4th March, 2024, of a supposed courtroom case on the Supreme Court. The President even went on to state that he was restrained by the submitting of a Writ of Summons from assenting to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.
“It turned out that as of the time that the President was chatting with members of the Diplomatic Corps on the 4th of March, 2024, the writ had not but been filed within the Supreme Court. The writ was subsequently filed on fifth March 2024.
“If we may ask, between the Rt. Hon. Speaker, who was served with a writ of summons, and the President, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, who acted on the advice of the same Attorney-General on an injunction from a non-existent writ, which of them showed fidelity to the law?”
“The answer obviously is the Rt. Hon. Speaker of Parliament”, the assertion careworn.