A buyer of the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company, Festus Onifade, has urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to cease the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission from persevering with with the implementation of multi-year tariff order 2024 which labeled electrical energy shoppers into Band A to E.
On April 3, the NERC elevated the electrical energy tariff for patrons receiving 20 hours of energy each day.
The electrical energy tariff for Band A prospects was elevated from N68 per kilowatt-hour to N255/KWh.
The NERC afterwards instructed the 11 Distribution Companies to reveal their lists of Band A prospects, who’re entitled to obtain a minimal of 20 hours of each day energy provide.
Onifade, a lawyer in a go well with marked FHC/ABJ/CS/492/2024, urged the courtroom to halt the classification and the tariff hike.
He particularly stated the classification was a breach of his basic rights and people of different prospects, urging the courtroom to declare it unconstitutional.
His reliefs partly learn, “A declaration that the Policy of classification of the Claimant and different Consumers by the first Defendant into band A, B, C, D and E is a breach of the Claimant’s and different Consumers basic Right to freedom from discrimination as enshrined within the African and Human and People Right’s and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended) and due to this fact unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, null and void.
“An order restraining NERC, AEDC and the Attorney-General of the Federation from continuing with the policy of classification of Nigerian customers to Band A, B, C, D and E by their location and increasing their tariffs pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.”
“An order of this Honourable Court perpetually restraining the Defendants, their privies, agents and other people from giving effect and continuing with the implementation of Multi-Year Tariff Order 2024 and increase in the of prices of Electricity and downgrading of the Claimant and other Customers by classification into Bands A, B, C, D, E forthwith,” he added.
In an affidavit he deposed to, Onifade said that the classification amounted to discrimination towards himself and different prospects not residing in intellectual areas.
He contended with the classification that prospects residing in much less privileged areas, together with himself, would have a decrease energy provide.
Onifade stated, “By advantage of this classification, the primary Defendant labeled the second Defendant’s Customers dwelling within the excessive brown city areas of Maitama, Asokoro, Aso villa to Band A to take pleasure in electrical energy provide for 20 hours and above.
“By the same classification, the first Defendant classified the Claimant and other second Defendant’s Customers living in less privileged areas to Band B, C D and E thereby consigning these categories of customers to a perpetual state of lower, limited electricity supply of 16 hours for customers on band B, 12 hours and above for Customers on Band C, 8 hours and above for Customers on band D and 6 hours and above for Customers on Band E respectively.”
No date has been fastened for listening to of the matter.