The IEA emphasised the shortage of proactive measures by policymakers to strengthen the cedi, criticizing their reactive method of ready till the scenario escalates earlier than taking motion.
In a press assertion launched on Monday, May 20, 2024, the IEA additional expressed issues about Ghana’s reliance on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and funding from growth companions to stabilize the cedi, describing this method as “unsustainable.”
The IEA argued that Ghana’s quite a few engagements with the IMF haven’t resulted in lasting stability for the cedi.
The IEA warned that the cedi is dealing with a big risk and urged for quick measures to mitigate this threat.
It mentioned for the reason that nation adopted a versatile alternate price regime in 1983, with the cedi pegged to the greenback at 2.75, the foreign money has typically declined, experiencing solely transient intervals of stability.
The assertion famous that “since Ghana adopted a flexible exchange rate regime from 1983 when the cedi was pegged to the dollar at a rate of 2.75, the currency has continued on a declining path with only short intermittent periods of stability-to May 16, 2024, when the official rate is quoted as GH¢13.77=USD1.00 (or 137,700 old cedis=1 US dollar). On a cumulative basis, the cedi has depreciated by 99.99% from 1983 to 2024. It has to be noted that, mathematically, any quantity that depreciates (or devalues) by 100% falls to zero or virtually vanishes.”
“…This tells us that the cedi is under an existential threat and requires urgent actions to rescue it from that threat. Unfortunately, over the years, our economic managers have failed to address the cedi problem head-on. The problem is that our policymakers have consistently failed to take the requisite measures to buttress the cedi. Almost invariably, they wait till the situation begins to get out of control before they adopt firefighting, albeit unsustainable, measures,” it added.
Earlier, Dr. John Kwakye, Director of Research at IEA likened the administration of Ghana’s financial system to the dealing with of English Premier League powerhouse Manchester United, citing each as being poorly managed, leading to dismal efficiency.
He contended that the financial managers of Ghana, akin to these of Manchester United, lack the perception wanted to deal with their respective challenges.
He indicated that the managers of the financial system are promising financial transformation, lean authorities, fiscal self-discipline, and pure useful resource possession, amongst different issues.