Governor of the Bank of Ghana (BoG), Dr Ernest Addion, has mentioned that every one that the Bank did as varied shocks hit the financial system was according to prudent disaster administration.
In 2020 pandemic, he mentioned, the Central Bank supported the financing of the budget to guard lives and livelihoods.
Again, he added, within the 2022 financial and liquidity disaster, the Central Bank wouldn’t have acted otherwise however performed its position as an computerized stabilizer to keep away from pushing the financial system to a tipping level which presumably may have spilled into social upheavals as was the case in Sri Lanka.
“It is very clear that only a Central Bank that has been prudently ran, built buffers, and well positioned, that can step in to support an economy from collapse. It is therefore most appropriate, I believe, to state that Ghanaians should rather applaud and commend the resilience of the Bank of Ghana,” Dr Addison mentioned on the Chartered Institute of Bankers 2023 Governor’s Day in Accra.
Dr Addison additional acknowledged that the disaster ended with an International Moneyray Fund (IMF) bailout programme which was authorized in May 2023. The corrective insurance policies included stringent fiscal and financial insurance policies to assist restore macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability whereas laying the muse for inclusive progress.
It emerged from the discussions that ensued that macroeconomic changes alone wouldn’t be sufficient to take care of the issue of debt sustainability, because the debt sustainability evaluation confirmed that Ghana’s debt would nonetheless not be sustainable even after
the anticipated macroeconomic changes and subsequently some type of debt remedy was
wanted to help your complete programme, he mentioned.
“The construction of Ghana’s debt was such that each home and exterior debt therapies had been required as a consequence of their virtually equal proportions within the complete debt. The Debt Exchange (DDE) program, the place the inventory of Government of Ghana debt was to be halved from 105 % of GDP (together with contingent liabilities) to 55 % of GDP by 2028 was launched, beginning off with the Domestic Debt Exchange.
“Implementation of the DDEP was not a simple job because it was the primary time {that a} nation in Africa needed to endure a debt restructuring programme, which not solely coated exterior collectors, but in addition home collectors. Broadly, sovereign debt
exercises are painful, for the debtor nation, its residents, its collectors, and official collectors.
“It have to be executed very fastidiously for the financial system to return to regular financial exercise
shortly. Under circumstances the place entry to credit score markets stays unavailable, and commerce finance is hampered, international direct funding is withered, and monetary instability
stays, the longer it should take the financial system to get better. The preliminary debt restructuring situations needed to be tweaked a number of instances between the preliminary
announcement and the ultimate situations. On the home aspect, households, establishments,
pension funds and the Banks, considerably noticed much less punitive remedy than initially designed.
“Given that the debt threshold remained unchanged, the Bank of Ghana needed to subsequently step in because the ‘loss absorber’ with a extra punitive remedy (50% haircut) than initially
designed, resulting in a big loss on the Bank of Ghana, driving it into detrimental fairness on the
finish of 2022.
“This is not to justify the losses, but to indicate that the policy choices made by the Bank during those difficult times were for the greater good of the economy. The Bank has commenced corrective actions to deal with the aftereffects of the losses and remains committed to the highest standards of sound management, transparent accounting, and good governance practises.”
Most central banks the world over expertise losses in 2022.
In the case of Ghana, the primary cause for the Bank of Ghana‘s GHS60.8 billion loss was the impairment of the holding of marketable Government shares and non-marketable devices of Government all being held within the books of the central financial institution, the Bank mentioned earlier.
The BoG mentioned this inventory of presidency devices has been constructed through the years. In addition, the Bank’s publicity to COCOBOD, which has been constructed through the years, was additionally impaired.
“As everyone knows, the Government of Ghana launched into each home and exterior debt restructuring. The holdings of Government devices and COCOBOD exposures had been all a part of the perimeter of the debt exchange. Whereas all different stakeholders that participated within the Domestic Debt Exchange (DDEP) didn’t have principal haircuts, however slightly had new devices with new tenors and coupon construction, the BoG, which served because the loss absorber to your complete debt change program, a key requirement that allowed the Government of Ghana to fulfill the edge for the approval of the IMF programme
“As a result, the BoG had to take on a 50 percent principal haircut on the total principal (which stood at GHC 64.5 billion at the time of the exchange),” the BoG mentioned in assertion offering solutions to regularly requested questions on the losses on Tuesday, August 1, 2023.
It added “Consequently, BoG had new devices with prolonged tenor and considerably diminished coupon. By making use of the complete necessities of IFRS 9, because of this from the principal alone, a 50 % haircut on the non-marketables amounted to a lack of GHC32.3 billion.
“The impairment from exposure to COCOBOD also amounted to GHC 4.7 billion. These three DDEP items (ie marketable, non-marketable and COCOBOD) accounted for GHC53.1 billion out of the total loss of GHC 60.8 billion for 2022. In addition to these three items, price and exchange rate valuation effects accounted for GHC 5.2 billion of the total loss, whereas interest expense on cost of monetary policy operation accounted for GH3.3 billion.”
Due to the impairment of the Government of Ghana’s securities holdings of ¢48.45 billion, impairment of loans and advances granted to quasi-government and monetary establishments amounting to ¢6.12 billion and the depreciation of the native foreign money leading to web change lack of ¢5.27 billion, the Bank of Ghana recorded GHS60.6billion loss in 2022.
In an announcement answering some questions regarding this matter the BoG mentioned “Are there Central Banks that made losses in 2022 akin to what Ghana skilled in 2022? The Bog mentioned in 2022, a number of central banks run losses and, in some circumstances, the losses pushed them into detrimental fairness. Let me contact on a number of of them and the statistics:
“The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) recorded a 2022 e book lack of 37 billion Australian {dollars}, which greater than worn out the central financial institution’s fairness. The UK Government faces £150 billion invoice to cowl Bank of England‘s losses (According to the Financial Times of July 25, 2023).
“The Swiss National Bank (SNB) in early January reported a document preliminary lack of 132
billion francs for 2022. In September 2022, the central financial institution of the Netherlands notified the nation’s authorities in a letter that it tasks web curiosity losses amounting to a possible EUR 9 billion for the years 2023 by 2026. The US Federal Reserve has now not been in a position to remit weekly billion-dollar transfers to the US Treasury since autumn 2022. Instead, a debt obligation to the US Treasury (a legal responsibility that the Fed acknowledges as a deferred asset) has been rising on the Fed’s steadiness sheet since then. The Fed ultimately should pay this legal responsibility someday sooner or later (when it resumes producing earnings).
“For the monetary 12 months ended 31 March 2023, the Monetary Authority of Singapore recorded
a web lack of $30.8 billion. Why Central Banks are reporting losses in 2022: Central banks exist to fulfil their coverage mandates, together with value and monetary stability.
“The attainment of this mandate includes the central financial institution taking up monetary dangers resembling credit score threat and rate of interest dangers, by loans to business banks/authorities or foreign money threat, by the holding of international change reserves.
“Some of those dangers might materialize resulting in losses. Making losses might subsequently be completely suitable with a central financial institution’s remit of making certain the graceful functioning of the economy.
“It contributes to a well-functioning financial system by sustaining confidence within the monetary system and by stabilizing inflation and financial exercise. Therefore, the success of central financial institution interventions ought to at all times be judged on whether or not they fulfil these mandates.