Bawku Central lawmaker Mahama Ayariga who can be a personal authorized practitioner has stated that there was nothing legally incorrect with the Attorney-General’s resolution to not notify attorneys of South Dayi Member of Parliament Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor for an expedited listening to of the swimsuit towards the consideration of the brand new ministers.
Mr Ayariga stated the Attorney-General has not breached any regulation for not notifying attorneys of the get together.
“He felt that he needed to be heard quickly, there is a debate about whether he should serve the other party, I don’t think it is legally mandatory. There has not been a return date set for the other party in the case to be notified. [Therefore] he doesn’t breach any rule or law but it is not just fine.”
The Attorney-General Godfred Dame has stated that he utilized for a speedy listening to of the injunction utility that was filed by the South Dayi Member of Parliament Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor towards the consideration of the ministerial nominees of President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.
He defined that the Court Act and the Constitution allow a celebration to a case to use for expeditious listening to of the case therefore he doesn’t perceive the criticism towards the Supreme Court for listening to this matter rapidly.
His feedback come on the heels of the criticisms by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) towards Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonorr, within the scheduling of political circumstances within the Supreme Court. The NDC accused her for being biased towards them.
The get together’s concern was close to the itemizing of the case filed by Mr Dafeamekpor, for listening to, forward of the case of Richard Dela Sky v. the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney-General.
According to an announcement issued by the NDC on Wednesday, March 27, 2024, it was intriguing that “Richard Dela Sky filed his writ of summons in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, on the 5th of March 2024. This was almost two (2) clear weeks before Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor filed his writ of summons on 18th March, 2024 challenging the constitutionality of the latest ministerial nominations by the President.”
But talking to journalists in Accra after the Supreme Court dismissed Dafeakpeos’ utility, Mr Dame stated “The obligation to repair the date for the listening to rests with the registry of the Supreme Court and I don’t perceive the place this enterprise of individuals truly scrutinizing when functions are mounted for listening to or why this case has not been mounted for listening to, got here from.
“Back within the day, should you file an utility within the Supreme Court of Ghana it takes you even three months so that you can get a date for a listening to. It is barely after a celebration has made an utility for an expeditious willpower of the method that the matter will come up for listening to. even the document present that on this specific case, I particularly utilized for an expeditious willpower of the matter so it’s not the Supreme Court of Ghana choosing and selecting which location ought to hear and to not hear.
“My first application for an expedited hearing hearing of a matter in the Supreme Court I did it way back in 2006 and I did another one in 2013 when we were in opposition. so it is always the prerogative of the Supreme Court registry to fix applications for hearing and if the date for the hearing has not been fixed or it is too far it is incumbent on the party to apply for the CJ in accordance with the court act and constitution for an expedited hearing.”
He additional described the injunction utility Dafeamekpor towards the consideration of the ministerial nominees, as frivolous and an abuse of the court docket course of after stating that it was an utility was an try to frustrate the work of the federal government.
Asked why it seems he’s taking a eager curiosity in solely issues that favor the federal government and never submitting for an expedited listening to within the utility towards anti-gay invoice, Mr Dame stated “we now have filed a related affidavit in opposition in that matter, so I feel all these feedback are undesirable and certainly are baseless. we truly filed our opposition to the affidavit in reply to the Richard Sky matter earlier than we filed the affidavit in reply as we speak to this one.
“It is most instructive that parliament itself was opposed to this application for interlocutory injunction by Dafeamekpor and I find it very interesting because the same Speaker of Parliament who earlier on adjourned proceedings in my view wrongly, on account of the pendency of this application then later on somersaulted and came to the supreme court and opposed the application and that is a point of interest to me. I think it shows clearly that the application clearly was frivolous and it ought not to be any manipulation of what went on in court, even parliament itself was opposed to the application.”
He added “It is most unfortunate that persons who file processes before the court and then fail to take an interest in it. Indeed even when the same application for interlocutory injunction is pending has not been determined, a day before they proceed to go and file another application for interlocutory injunction, there cannot be a greater demonstration of a desrre to abuse the court process than this. clearly, it shows an attempt to frustrate the republic from pursuing its business and all. That is why it is necessary that as lawyers for the Republic, we take a keen interest in what happens and we make sure that such things are dealt with so that the state business can proceed.”
On Wednesday, March 27 the Supreme Court dismissed an injunction utility filed by Dafeamekpor towards Parliament’s approval of ministerial nominees by President Akufo-Addo.
By a unanimous resolution, the apex Court stated the injunction utility is frivolous and an abuse of the court docket course of.Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor had filed an injunction restraining Parliament from vetting and approving new ministers in addition to reshuffled ministers given numerous portfolios. He was praying the court docket to deem the motion by President Akufo-Addo as unconstitutional.
President Akufo-Addo on February 14, 2024 had introduced a reshuffle consisting of 13 ministers and 10 deputy ministers being relieved of their publish, whereas 6 of them had been reassigned into numerous portfolios.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2024, when the case was referred to as, the South Dayi Member of Parliament in addition to his lawyer, Nii Kpakpo Samoa Addo had been each absent.
Events took an fascinating twist when the five-member panel chaired by the Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkonoo stood down the listening to for about 10 minutes to establish the main points of paperwork submitted by the court docket bailiff.
The bailiff had indicated that in his quest to serve court docket processes to the Speaker of Parliament (1st defendant) and Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor (Plaintiff) the latter had refused service.
Joshua Benning narrated to the court docket {that a} listening to discover and affidavit in opposition paperwork which had been despatched to the regulation agency of representatives of Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor had been rejected as a result of “an order had been made by the lawyer Nii Kpakpo Samoa Addo not to receive any service”
The Chief Justice then ordered for the listening to of the case to progress after the bailiff confirmed that the Speaker of Parliament had duly been served and he had additionally left the court docket paperwork on the premises of the plaintiff’s lawfirm.
Attorney-General Godfred Dame then described actions by the plaintiff’s lawyer as the very best type of disrespect to the apex court docket and as skilled misconduct and referred to as for the dismissal of the swimsuit.
Responding to the swimsuit, Thaddeus Sory, counsel for the Speaker of Parliament additionally against the injunction utility citing that it didn’t fulfill the necessities for an injunction to be granted.
Ruling on the matter, the apex court docket dismissed the injunction utility by Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor with the explanation that the swimsuit was towards minister nominees whose names haven’t been submitted.
Mr Godfred Dame additional stated “It is exceptional for a lawyer who has filed an utility within the matter to reject the course and the processes which have been filed by the opposite facet.
“It is admittedly for me, a gross skilled misconduct. Be that as it could, the court docket proceeded to take care of the matter and that’s it. I feel it was very unlucky particularly as the identical counsel was in the identical day submitting processes within the Supreme Court of Ghana earlier within the morning It was rejected the processes from the Supreme Court of Ghana and within the afternoon he proceeded to file processes in the identical Supreme Court of Ghana.
“I think the processes of the highest court of the Republic ought to be respected, and the dignity and authority of the court always ought to be protected and respected by all counsels.”