According to myjoyonline.com, in her ruling, she clarified that Aisha Huang’s prosecution was carried out beneath Act 900, which beforehand stipulated a most penalty of 5 years for unauthorized mining actions.
She lamented the restrictions of the Act, indicating her need to impose a extra prolonged jail time period if permitted by regulation.
“I wish I had the right to impose the punishment under the current law,” remarked Justice Lydia, as quoted by myjoyonline.com.
Under the amended Minerals and Mining Act of 2019, Act 995, Aisha Huang might have confronted a minimal of 15 years and a most of 25 years in jail.
In November 2022, Aisha Huang confronted 4 costs, together with participating in mining with out a license, facilitating unauthorized mining operations, using overseas nationals illegally, and getting into Ghana whereas prohibited. Despite being deported in 2018, she reportedly re-entered Ghana by way of the Aflao border in October 2022 to renew mining actions. The state had beforehand dropped comparable costs with a nolle prosequi.
Throughout the trial spanning over a yr, the Chinese unlawful miner pleaded not responsible to all costs besides getting into Ghana whereas prohibited. The state introduced eleven witnesses, together with farmers who bought lands to Aisha Huang and witnessed her participating in unlawful mining. Prosecutors additionally supplied video proof showcasing the environmental harm brought on by Aisha Huang.
After thorough consideration of the proof, the choose concluded that the state had confirmed its case in opposition to her sufficiently.