– Advertisement –
Presently trending on-line is the story of a facet chick who has infamously made a file as the primary mistress to drag her sponsor recognized as Ernest Kwasi Nimako to court for reneging on his promise made to her throughout their sexual relationship.
The younger lady, Deborah Seyram Adablah is asking the court to pressure her man Mr Nimako, a senior officer of the First Atlantic Bank and a deacon at First Baptist Church to fulfil his guarantees to her – that is to purchase her a automotive, rent a spot for her and pay her monthly allowances.
Deborah claims that she started seeing her sugar daddy when she was performing her nationwide service. Per their ‘contract’, he offered her with a automotive, rented an condo for her at Labadi and provided her ₵3,000 monthly earnings.
– Advertisement –
However, alongside the road, he couldn’t maintain the ‘contract’ and this has compelled her to use the court tot combat for her proper.
She claimed that he used the reassurance that he would safe funding for her to launch a enterprise to persuade her not to settle for an employment supply when her nationwide service was accomplished.
Check out extra particulars of the swimsuit under…
Statement of Claim
- Plaintiff is an unemployed lady residing at Labadi, Accra.
- 1st Defendant is a director of finance working with the 2nd Defendant financial institution’s Head Office in Accra.
- 2nd Defendant is a financial institution and or monetary establishment registered beneath the legal guidelines of the Republic of Ghana with its registered workplace in Accra and is the employer of the first Defendant, and additionally the place the plaintiff labored as a National Service personnel till her exit from the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, between her and the twond Defendant, she labored with the twond Defendant financial institution as a National Service personnel and the 1st Defendant was her superior because the Chief Finance Officer (CFO) on the 2nd Defendant financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that in or about 10/10/2020, she was posted to the twond Defendant financial institution Head Office to do her National Service the place the 1st Defendant labored because the Head of Finance division designated because the Chief Finance Officer (CFO).
- Plaintiff avers that throughout her nationwide service work, she and the 1st Defendant entered right into a Parlor relationship. Plaintiff avers that, the connection began in consequence of a persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 1st Defendant, a superior officer who wielded so much of energy which the plaintiff lastly gave in with out which she would have discovered working within the 2nd Defendant workplace a nightmare.
- Plaintiff avers that, when she began working with the twond Defendant financial institution, she noticed persistent sexual harassment by senior male officers towards feminine staff of the financial institution and should you failed to give in to their calls for, your life within the financial institution is made sad, uncomfortable and unfriendly to work in. Plaintiff avers that, just about every senior supervisor has a girlfriend within the financial institution and they alter the women at their will to the data of the managers of the twond Defendant financial institution. They additionally use we the feminine workers to make advances to very wealthy prospects with a view to sleeping with them and getting them to open accounts with the financial institution to the detriments of the feminine staffs.
- Plaintiff avers that, it’s towards this background of persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 15 Defendant on the plaintiff, whereas the twond Defendant seemed on with out taking measures to remove identical however inspired identical by her acts of omission that plaintiff had no different than to fall prey within the fingers of the 1st Defendant and gave in to a Parlor relationship with the 1st Defendant. Plaintiff avers that, the twond Defendant as her employer owed her an obligation of care which 2nd Defendant failed her, and worst nonetheless, 2nd Defendant additionally pushed her to attain out to male prospects to bait them with intercourse in trade of opening accounts with the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, her Parlor relationship was open and recognized to nearly all the employees within the 2nd Defendant financial institution and to the twond Defendant. Not solely was the twond Defendant conscious the plaintiff engaged on this unholy and unhealthy work relationship, it was the order of the day within the 2nd Defendant financial institution which the twond Defendant seemed on with out defending his/her feminine staff and on this case the Plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that, on the time she got here in as a National Service personnel, there was a feminine married lady employee who was additionally harassed and gave in, and it was an open secret within the financial institution recognized by all the employees and nobody can query identical because you stand to lose your job with the twond Defendant financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that, no worker is ready to testify to this impact since all of them concern shedding their jobs, and it is a single battle the plaintiff undertakes to combat with the hope that many feminine staff might be liberated from their bondage.
Plaintiff avers that, in any respect materials occasions, the 2nd Defendant owed an obligation of care to its staff particularly feminine staff who have been perpetually sexually harassed and abused within the office to the data of the 2nd Defendant who seemed on and inspired identical since all the highest executives have been concerned on this intercourse matches, with the Plaintiff’s personal with the first defendant.
– Advertisement –
2nd defendant beneath the Labour Act of Ghana owed some duties in the direction of her staff and the workers had rights which have been violated by the 2nd defendant.
- Plaintiff avers that she was not the one individual engaged to do National Service for the interval. She had different colleagues who have been additionally doing National Service about the identical time. Plaintiff avers that when the National Service was about to come to an finish, the National Service personnel and particularly the plaintiff and her colleagues have been about to be engaged as Contract Employees by the financial institution.
- Plaintiff avers that the 15 defendant having abused his place as Chief Finance officer (CFO) harassed Plaintiff into accepting a parlor relationship and succeeded in persuading Plaintiff to agree to exit the financial institution i.e. First Atlantic Bank in spite of the actual fact that she and her colleaques had a possibility to proceed as Contract Staff so that they may proceed the parlor relationship at an attractive consideration.
- Plaintiff with all of the assurances from the first defendant to exit the financial institution and not take up a contract and in return for that 1st defendant made representations and assurances to the plaintiff to the impact that he’ll give the plaintiff the next:
- Lump sum working capital to begin enterprise.
- Pay for her lodging/Rent for 3 years
- Buy her a automotive
- Pay her GH¢3,000.00 a month
- Buy plaintiff a hoop
- Pay her medical and different Bills together with paying for her to endure a household planning remedy so that she is not going to give start within the quick time period.
- To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his spouse within the course of their parlor relationship since 1st Defendant’s relationship with his spouse was challenged, with irreconcilable variations and the wedding had damaged down past repairs and or reconciliation.
Generally to take care of the plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that on the power of these representations; when her colleagues have been engaged on Contract, she didn’t even apply to take up the Contract appointment and exited upon the tip of her National Service in July 2021. Plaintiff additionally agreed to interact within the Parlor relationship with the 1St defendant pending marriage.
- Plaintiff avers that having undertaken and certainly and actually agreed to perform her half of the discount as acknowledged in paragraph 14 and 15 herein, the 15 defendant additionally agreed to execute his half of the discount.
- Plaintiff avers that true to the 15 defendant’s representations and assurances, he offered the Plaintiff with a 2-bed room lodging at a rental worth of GH¢1,500 per month and paid the first-year rent leaving an excellent 2 years rent of H/No.GL-010-0745 Labadi, Accra which the plaintiff continues to be occupying, on the time of situation of this Writ which is due to be renewed. Indeed, Plaintiff has now been taken to the rent management for ejection.
- Plaintiff avers that 1st defendant additionally began paying the Plaintiff a monthly stipend/allowance/ wage of GH¢3,000 per month and has been paying identical till July 2022 when the events began having variations and the first Defendant is now in arrears of fee on the time of issuing this Writ.
- 1st Defendant additionally requested the Plaintiff to go and look for a automotive for herself so that he pays for it. Plaintiff due to this fact contacted a Car supplier and received a automotive i.e. Honda Civic a house used and unregistered automotive. Plaintiff bargained for it on the cost of GH¢120,000 which plaintiff referred the automotive supplier to the first defendant who paid for the automotive, registered it and handed the keys over to the Plaintiff which she has been driving for just a little over a 12 months now.
- Plaintiff additional avers that the first Defendant to guarantee that he monitored Plaintiff’s motion and to have a monopoly over her, put in a monitoring machine i.e., a monitoring machine in Plaintiff’s automotive and monitored plaintiff in every single place she went even when he’s out of the nation he displays plaintiff from outdoors and can at his beck and name cease the automotive at any time when he needed.
- Plaintiff avers that, in furtherance of the first Defendant wanting to have sexual . intercourse with her with out safety from 1st defendant, he put the plaintiff to a dangerous medical household planning remedy despite the fact that, the events knew the chance entailed which she introduced to the eye of the 1s Defendant. 1st Defendant due to this fact paid for Plaintiff’s household planning remedy at Marie Stopes Clinic Kokomlemle, Accra and additionally paid for her medical payments every time she faces the impact of the Family Planning injection which made her to bleed excessively.
Recently Plaintiff was confronted with related extreme bleeding and contacted the 1st Defendant to finance the remedy which he ignored. Plaintiff has been having issues and has been visiting specialist at each Trust Hospital and 37 Military Hospital for remedy.
- Plaintiff at very late-night hours on the directions of the first defendant had to fake to be a secretary within the workplace known as Emefa at any time when the first Defendant’s spouse known as, all to affirm to the plaintiff that, his marriage was certainly challenged.
To the extent that the spouse contacted the Plaintiff to affirm story.
- Plaintiff avers that these days she began having issues with the first defendant over variations in the best way they need to proceed with their relationship. 15 Defendant needed to have unnatural carnal data of the Plaintiff however plaintiff refused.
This continued severally and the events’ variations continued to widen.
- Plaintiff avers that there have been related requests from the first defendant of diverse nature which weren’t in conformity with societal norms. Plaintiff and the first defendant then met and determined to convey an finish to their relationship.
- At one such assembly at Brasa Restaurant the events reached an Agreement for the first Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff. When they reached their settlement on the assembly, Plaintiff fearing that this will in future be denied by both social gathering requested that they file on audio/video of the understanding or agreements reached. Plaintiff and 1st defendant despatched textual content messages to Plaintiff pointing to their understanding and is accessible and might be tendered on the trial.
- Plaintiff avers that on one event, when 1st defendant was out of the Country in Dubai, 1st Defendant used the monitoring machine to forcefully cease the automotive whereas Plaintiff was driving on the highway, which was life threatening. Plaintiff promised to restore the automotive or be reimbursed by the first Defendant, however when plaintiff repaired the automotive and knowledgeable the first Defendant, he relatively went to the Mechanic and sprayers and confirmed them paperwork of the automotive displaying his title because the proprietor of the automotive. 1st Defendant insisted to choose the automotive, however the mechanic, welder and the sprayer is not going to give him entry. Plaintiff avers that, in complete a sum of GH¢10,000.00 was paid to the Welder. GH¢500.00 was paid for Parts purchased by the mechanic and his workmanship GH¢6500, the sprayer GH¢3,000.00 and they’ve failed to situation the Plaintiff receipt regardless of persistent request to accomplish that.
- Plaintiff avers that it was solely at this level that she realized that the automotive was not in her title. Plaintiff avers that this shocked her. Plaintiff additionally instructed the Mechanics/Sprayers to make a report to the Police which they did, however 1st Defendant has threatened them and they won’t need to have something to do with this case.
- Plaintiff avers that, she instructed her attorneys to focus on with the first defendant’s attorneys however the 1st defendant was prepared to change the papers of the automotive he bought for the Plaintiff into the Plaintiff’s and additionally pay some of the medical payments however not all, therefore this motion.
- Plaintiff additionally went herself to make a report to DOVVSU at Police headquarters however the police didn’t give her the mandatory help.
- Plaintiff then instructed her lawyer to take up the temporary and plaintiff’s lawyer wrote to the first Defendant to have the matter amicably resolved, however 1st Defendant failed, refused or uncared for to settle.
- Plaintiff avers that after 1st Defendant acquired the discover from her Lawyer, 1st Defendant lodged a Complaint of stealing the automotive at a Police station and was accompanied by the top of 2nd defendant’s safety known as […] and led the police workforce to besiege her home, forcefully took the automotive and towed the automotive to the Greater Accra Regional Police Station on a working day. Plaintiff has footage and movies of the first Defendant and 2nd Defendant’s consultant (Daniel Afrifa) who led the police to invade Plaintiff’s residence, embarrassed her and put her in a perpetual shock decreasing her repute earlier than the right-thinking members of her neighborhood Labadi-Lamptey George.
- Plaintiff was shocked to know that she was being charged for stealing the automotive 1st defendant purchased for her throughout their relationship. Plaintiff wrote her Statement and the police after going via the Statement met each events which included the top of 2nd Defendant’s safety; who participated actively and at a degree challenged the crime officer who condemned the arrest by his officers along with the defendants. The police after listening to the events got here to a dedication that the defendants have misled them to act since they thought that was not stealing and they launched the automotive to the Plaintiff.
- Plaintiff avers that the police and the defendants embarrassed her at her home, her neighbours got here taking a look at her, the police within the course of assaulted the Plaintiff and identical was reported on the Labadi Police Station. The defendants did all these in unhealthy religion and led the police to maliciously take steps to arrest and prosecute her for an offence defendants knew she didn’t commit.
- Plaintiff has since had a shock and this remedy has affected her for a while now and proceed to hang-out her in her life with fingers being pointed at her in consequence of the malicious conduct exhibited by the defendants.
- Plaintiff avers that, days after, the police launched her automotive to her. The 1st Defendant’s lawyer then replied to the Plaintiff lawyer’s letter denying the claims.
- Plaintiff aver that she has been used, abused, maltreated, exploited, deceived, dissatisfied, failed and insulted by the acts of the defendants. Plaintiff additionally has severally been threatened by the first Defendant verbally and additionally despatched threatening textual content messages to Plaintiff placing her life at risk and this has been captured in Plaintiff’s Statement to the Police.
- The conduct of the Defendants has injured the Plaintiff and lowered her repute and standing in her neighborhood and additionally the first Defendant has failed to carry via their understandings, preparations, guarantees and or settlement and except compelled by this honourable Court for the first Defendant to honor his half of the discount he’ll persist in his everlasting refusal.
- Wherefore, the Plaintiff claims collectively and severally towards the defendants as follows:
- a) An order that the first defendant transfers title of automotive No. GC-7899-21 into the title of the plaintiff and or an order directed at DVLA to Register the Car No.GC-7899-21 into the title of the Plaintiff because the proprietor.
- b) A refund of cost of repairs of GH¢10,000.00 which 1st Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff however failed.
- c) An order that the Defendants pay to the Plaintiff the next:
(i) 1st Defendant pays lump sum cash to the plaintiff to allow the plaintiff begin a enterprise to take care of herself as agreed by the plaintiff and the first Defendant.
(ii) 1st Defendant pays the remaining two (2) years rent for Plaintiff’s lodging or to pay identical quantity for the remaining two (2) years on the identical charge at another lodging.
(iii) 1st Defendant to pay the excellent arrears of Plaintiff’s monthly allowance from July 2022 to the date of Judgment and pay all medical bills in consequence of the unwanted side effects of the Family Planning remedy.
(iv) General damages towards the Defendants.
(d) Any different reliefs the Court deems obligatory together with authorized cost
