South Africa’s opposition Democratic Alliance has accused former president Jacob Zuma’s uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) get together, whose spectacular electoral debut has upended the nation’s politics, of receiving marketing campaign finance from Moscow.
John Steenhuisen, the DA chief, informed the Financial Times in an interview that Zuma’s get together, based six month in the past, had been extraordinarily effectively funded from the primary voter registration drive in January when it was solely weeks previous.
“I’m certain that money has flown into their accounts from Russia,” mentioned Steenhuisen, including that the MK get together had gazebos, branded clothes and different expensive electoral provides from the primary day of its marketing campaign. “This is not some mom and pop organisation. I definitely think there is Russian money,” he mentioned, although he conceded there was no proof.
Nhlamulo Ndhlela, MK get together spokesperson, was adamant it had obtained no funding or help from Russia.
“President Zuma and President [Vladimir] Putin have enjoyed a relationship that goes back 40 years. They’re friends. But that’s not the same as the Russian government supporting the MK party,” he mentioned.
On Steenhuisen’s accusation, Ndhlela mentioned the DA chief was looking for to deflect from MK’s perception that “the west” had assisted in manipulating the South African election. He mentioned the MK would elaborate on this allegation when it lodges court docket papers contesting the election ends in the approaching days.
MK has not lodged declarations of donations with the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC), not like different giant events within the election. All events are obliged to report donations of greater than R100,000 ($5,300).
Sy Mamabolo, IEC chief electoral officer, mentioned there had been questions over the supply of MK’s funding however that no official investigation had been launched.
“They haven’t made any declarations,” he informed the FT. “We’re bound by the legal framework, which is that we cannot launch an investigation until either there is an official complaint, which we haven’t had, or an auditor flags this to us.”
Herman Mashaba, chief of the ActionSA get together, mentioned there have been massive questions over the place Zuma’s get together bought its funding. “The MK party spent lavishly in this election, yet they have made no declarations to the IEC. This doesn’t make sense. There has been plenty of talk where this came from, and we don’t have hard evidence yet, but they ought to explain it.”
Zuma, whose get together bought almost 15 per cent of the vote, has made no secret of his shut affiliation with Putin or his lengthy affiliation with Russia. As a member of the ANC’s armed wing, additionally known as MK, within the late-Seventies, Zuma did a navy coaching course within the then Soviet Union.
Social media accounts on X that previously promoted Russian speaking factors switched to amplifying messages of help for Zuma’s get together through the election marketing campaign, based on the London-based Centre for Information Resilience.
Duduzile Sambudla-Zuma, one in all Zuma’s daughters, who’s seen as an essential determine in MK, beforehand described Putin as “Africa’s saviour”. She was the “main amplifier of the #IStandwithPutin trend in South African communities on Twitter”, CIR mentioned in a report final yr.
Neither Zuma nor Sambudla-Zuma may very well be reached for remark.
Priyal Singh, a senior researcher on the Institute for Security Studies think-tank, mentioned: “We really can’t be definitive at this stage, but it wouldn’t be surprising if the MK party had received Russian funding, given the close interpersonal links between Zuma and Putin.”
Singh mentioned Russia would contemplate it essential to have somebody of Zuma’s stature in South Africa who might probably additional Moscow’s industrial or ideological pursuits.
![Supporters of the MK party wave flags](https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fb2c7e521-2993-4ea2-90b8-d723ba17419e.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1)
Under Zuma’s presidency, from 2009-2018, South Africa joined the Brics bloc of countries together with Brazil, Russia, India and China. Zuma additionally campaigned for a nuclear take care of Russia that unbiased consultants mentioned can be financially ruinous for South Africa.
He additionally signed a R1tn nuclear settlement with Russian state-owned Rosatom to construct nuclear energy stations. A South African court docket subsequently concluded the deal was unlawful as a result of Zuma had not sought parliamentary approval. The Zondo fee of inquiry into state seize discovered that Zuma had axed his finance minister for opposing the deal.
MK’s manifesto guarantees to reinstate a nuclear programme and states that it “stands in solidarity with Russia, Cuba and Palestine in their struggle against western imperialist forces”. Zuma has additionally supported Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, calling Putin a “man of peace” who had been provoked by the enlargement of the Nato alliance.
Mmusi Maimane, chief of the Build One South Africa get together, additionally questioned the supply of MK’s financing. “Someone has funded the MK. The MK ran a few-hundred-million-rand campaign,” he mentioned, including that the get together had far outspent extra established rivals. “They have a really sophisticated electoral machine.”
Ndhlela, the MK spokesperson, mentioned the get together had little or no funding.
“It’s people trying to drive an agenda who say that,” he mentioned. “The only funding we’ve had has been provided by our members, such as individuals and businessmen, who have come together to help us.”
Political analysts say MK, which needs to scrap South Africa’s structure and claimed final week’s election was “rigged”, suited Moscow’s agenda of undermining the democratic course of in Africa.
Russia has developed shut relations with a number of African navy dictatorships, which have moved nearer to Moscow following the overthrow of fragile democratic governments.