The Supreme Court is about to resolve the destiny of latest ministers nominated and different ministers reshuffled by President Akufo-Addo following an injunction filed by Member of Parliament for South Dayi, Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor.
The NDC legislator in his go well with in opposition to the Speaker of Parliament (1st defendant) and the Attorney General (2nd defendant) argues that following the revocation of the appointments of among the ministers, the President ought to have sought the approval of Parliament earlier than giving them new portfolios.
President Akufo-Addo on February 14, 2024 introduced a reshuffle consisting of 13 ministers and 10 deputy ministers being relieved of their submit, whereas 6 of them had been reassigned into numerous portfolios.
The Apex court docket will hear the matter on Wednesday, March 27.
Below are the reliefs being sought by the Member of Parliament for South Dayi:
“a declaration that under Article 78(1) of the 1992 Constitution, a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament” and second, “a declaration that underneath Article 81(a) of the 1992 Constitution, the workplace of a Minister of State or a Deputy Minister shall grow to be vacant if his appointment is revoked, terminated or relieved of that portfolio by the President.
“a declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Articles 78(1) and 81 (a) of the 1992 Constitution, a Minister of State or Deputy Minister of State who has had his appointment revoked, terminated or relieved of portfolio by the President, cannot be re-assigned to another Ministerial or Deputy Ministerial office without prior approval of Parliament”.
“a declaration that upon a real and correct interpretation of Articles 78(1) and 81 (a) of the 1992 Constitution, as soon as a Minister of State or Deputy Minister of State has had his appointment revoked, terminated or relieved of that portfolio by the President, that Minister of State or Deputy Minister of State have to be topic to the requirement of prior Parliamentary approval earlier than that Minister of State or Deputy Minister of State is re-appointed as a Minister or Deputy-Minister of State.
“a declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Articles 78(1) and 81(a) of the 1992 Constitution, the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked on the 14th of February, 2024 cannot be re-assigned or re-appointed to other Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices without prior approval of Parliament”.
“a declaration that failure and/or refusal of the President of the Republic of Ghana to hunt the prior approval of Parliament earlier than purporting to re-assign the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments had been revoked or terminated or relieved of their portfolios on the 14th of February, 2024 quantities to a direct violation of Articles 78(1) and 81(a) of the 1992 Constitution.
“a declaration that any Ministerial appointment which has not been topic to prior Parliamentary approval is in direct violation of Article 78(1) of the 1992 Constitution.
“an order directing the President of the Republic of Ghana to submit to Parliament for prior approval, the names of the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked or terminated on the 14th of February, 2024 and who were subsequently supposedly re-assigned to other Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices for purposes of appointment as Ministers of State and Deputy Minister of State”.
“an order of interlocutory injunction restraining the Speaker of Parliament, the 1st Defendant herein, from proceeding with the vetting and approval of the names of the nominees of the President submitted to Parliament until the requirement that a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament is satisfied in respect to the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked on the 14th of February, 2024 have been re-assigned new Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices”.
“an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Speaker of Parliament 1st Defendant herein, from proceeding with the vetting and approval of the names of the nominees of the Presidential submitted to Parliament until the requirement that a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament is satisfied in respect to the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked on the 14th of February, 2024 and have been re-assigned new Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices”.
It could be recalled that the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin cited this go well with to announce his resolution to halt the approval processes for the minister designate.
“Hon Members, I additionally carry to your consideration, the receipt of a course of from the Courts titled Rockson-Nelson Etse Okay. Dafeamekpor vrs the Speaker of Parliament and the Attorney-General (Suit no. J1/12/2024) which course of was served on the nineteenth of March 2024 and an injunction movement on discover looking for to restrain the Speaker from continuing with the vetting and approval of the names of the individuals submitted by His Excellency the President till the provisions of the structure are glad.
Hon. Members within the mild of this course of, the House is unable to proceed to contemplate the nominations of His Excellency the President within the “spirit of upholding the rule of law“ until after the determination of the application for interlocutory injunction by the Supreme Court,” Mr Bagbin acknowledged.