The Edo State House of Assembly, on Wednesday, defined how the state’s Deputy Governor, Philip Shaibu, allegedly leaked the federal government’s secrets and techniques and dedicated perjury, which, it mentioned, had been impeachable offences.
The Assembly, represented by its Deputy Clerk, Joe Ohaifa, acknowledged its case on the inaugurating sitting of the seven-man panel probing Shaibu.
The panel, headed by retired Justice S.A. Omonuwa, was raised by the Edo State Chief Judge, Justice Daniel Okungbowa, on the occasion of the state Assembly, which on March 5 commenced impeachment proceedings towards the deputy authorities.
The Assembly mentioned the impeachment proceedings had been based mostly on a petition accusing Shaibu of perjury and leaking the federal government’s secrets and techniques.
The impeachment transfer is believed to be the most recent growth within the rift between Shaibu and his principal, Governor Godwin Obaseki.
There had been an uneasy calm between the deputy governor and his principal since final 12 months when Shaibu declared his curiosity to hitch this 12 months’s Edo governorship race.
Stating the Assembly case, the Deputy Clerk mentioned Shaibu leaked the state’s secrets and techniques within the affidavit he filed in help of an Abuja lawsuit.
He mentioned Shaibu rendered paperwork regarding the State Executive Council’s assembly.
According to Ohaifa, Shaibu violated the Oath of Secrecy he took and acted opposite to the provisions of Schedule 7 of the 1999 Constitution.
The panel, after listening to the Assembly’s case, adjourned until right now (Thursday), for Shaibu to enter his defence.
Earlier on the proceedings, Shaibu’s lawyer, Prof. Oladoyin Awoyale (SAN), had excused himself from the listening to after the panel declined his software to droop the proceedings.
Awoyale, in his submission, urged the panel to halt the impeachment proceedings pending the result of a go well with filed by Shaibu earlier than the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Awoyale advised the panel that the Abuja courtroom had mounted April 8 for events within the go well with to look to indicate trigger why it shouldn’t grant Shaibu’s prayer for an interlocutory injunction to halt the impeachment proceedings.
But opposing the prayer, the Deputy Clerk mentioned by advantage of Section 188 (10) of the 1999 Constitution, no courtroom had the proper to stop the House of Assembly, or the seven-man panel from performing their constitutional duties.
Ohiafi mentioned Shaibu’s lawyer should persuade the panel that the supply of the structure had been altered for the panel to maintain his argument.
In his ruling, the panel chairman, Justice Omonuwa, agreed with Ohiafi.
The retired decide famous that the invitation for the events to indicate trigger was not an order to halt the impeachment proceedings.
Justice Omonuwa mentioned the panel would proceed with the proceedings and requested the House of Assembly to state its case.
Responding to the ruling, Awoyale advised the panel that his shopper wouldn’t be capable of proceed to take part within the investigation and sought the panel’s permission to be excused.
When requested whether or not he was waiving his proper to defend his shopper, the SAN answered within the detrimental, stressing that events should obey the courtroom determination and that they need to seem earlier than it to indicate trigger.
Probed additional if he was “arresting the ruling of the panel”, Awoyale answered once more within the detrimental and reiterated the necessity to obey the courtroom which might be sitting on Monday, April 8, 2024.
The SAN, subsequently, took his depart.